Thank you for not using so many line breaks, makes the post a bit easier to read.
QUOTE(O)Matt_Burch @ Mar 14 2006, 04:54 PM)
If I was ACTUALLY saying I am "the Matt Burch" who created the "Escape Velocity" series. Then I would actually be doing something wrong. My account is perfectly eligible for this forum, according to the rules and regulations posted.
This is correct. Anybody who is paying attention would know you are not the real Matt Burch, and you haven't really attempted to impersonate him so you haven't done anything wrong there.
QUOTE(antihero @ Mar 14 2006, 01:18 AM)
why the hell do you need "ops" on battle.net?
QUOTE(O)Matt_Burch @ Mar 14 2006, 04:54 PM)
Operators on battle.net allow people to be alone, if there is a person that is annoying, you can just kick/ban him from that channel while you are there. If there is a bot as the operator you can tell the bot to kick/ban someone from your account and not the actual computer it is on. That is what most people use for Clan Channels.
From my experiences on battle.net (which I've used for a little over five years now), bots really come in handy when one is running a Starcraft clan. There were quite a few "sore losers" who would chase down the person that beat them and spam clan channels, in which case having a bot to maintain operators was nice. Otherwise, really annoying people could just camp out in clan channels and ban all clan members, hijacking the channel. I don't know if this is still the case.
Most of the bot hostility comes from the Diablo 2 spambots, and the Starcraft winbots (that made the ladder what it seems like today).
I do believe they fixed the issue of needing to have bots to maintain ops with clan channels in warcraft 3. High ranking clan members automatically always get op privileges and non-clan members can't be in the channel without a clan member escorting them. So the need for bots is decreasing.
QUOTE(O)Matt_Burch @ Mar 14 2006, 04:54 PM)
You do not use "AOL-language" at all?? AOL language is just shortening the word by making abbreviations. The way you just said that, shows you do talk AOL a little bit. WOW means "World of Warcraft" which is technically AOL talk.
This is the part I want to argue with. Just because people abbreviate words (such as "USA" for "United States of America") doesn't necessarily mean they are using AOL-language. They're using abbreviations. There is a big difference between abbreviating "you" as "u" and abbreviating "Who wants to form a group party to go raid the Upper Blackrock Spire Dungeon" as "LFG UBRS". The latter is tedious to write out so many words over and over, the former is just laziness with not being willing to type out two letters. Its this "lazy abbreviation" of common words that is often associated with AOL-Speek, abbreviations that don't really save a whole lot of time (about four tenths of a second unless you're a slow typer - in which case typing out a whole lot of words under pressure will help you become a faster typer) and increase reading complexity (especially with the addition of numbers) which is partly responsible for the short-temperedness about "AOL-Speek".
I don't think AOL-Speek is the future, I do think people will continue to abbreviate really long names (like Ambrosia Software) as they have always done - especially in history textbooks.